They for sure made you well-informed but they kind of spoiled the fun in watching the movie if you ask me. And a few weeks before the premier of the movie, NatGeo and Discovery Channel featured a barrage of programs that more or less debunked the various claims in the book. He should've just accepted the fact that book has been a work of pure fiction. It started with Dan Brown on National Geographic, if I am not mistaken, tried unconvincingly to claim that the book was based on historical facts. Who can really blame them when there has been a lot hypes surrounding the book and subsequently the movie. I notice that a lot of reviewers on this movie have been rather critical of it. I believe Ron Howard has been successful in bringing the book to the screen because watching the movie felt almost like reading it. But, it took only a few minutes into the movies to get my mind to realign to the correct story line. I thought there were going to be hi-tech jet, the CERN and Hassassin killing the cardinals. Unfortunately, I have also read "Angels and Demons" too and my mind had juxtaposed the two together into one confused mixed-up version. My wife and I went to see the "Da Vinci Code" last Wednesday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |